Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45489 (CHH)

NETRAM VERMA v. PARMANAND GRITLAHARE

MAC/107/2020 · 2025-07-13

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 107 of 2020 • Netram Verma S/o Lekhram Verma Aged About 25 Years Resident Of Village- Koliha Colony, Out Post- Lavan, Thana- Kasdol, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh --- Appellant versus 1. Parmanand Gritlahare S/o Late Arjun Gritlahare Aged About 29 Years Resident Of Dongridih, Thana- Kasdol Tahsil And District- Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 2. Chandranarayan Gritlahare S/o Late Arjun Gritlahare Aged About 30 Years Resident Of Dongridih, Thana- Kasdol Tahsil And District- Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 3. Yush Kumar S/o Lekhram Verma Aged About 20 Years Resident Of Village- Koliha Colony, Out Post- Lavan, Thana- Kasdol, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Motorcycle No. C.G.22-H- 1046) 4. Branch Manager Tata Aig General Insurance Company Limited, Office No. 403, Fourth Floor, DBCT Corporate Park, Flat No. 1 Block No. 9 Rajbandha Ground Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Insurance Company Of Motorcycle No. C.G.22-H- 1046) ---Respondents ____________________________________________________________ For appellant : None. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Sourabh Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 14/07/2025 1. There is no appearance on behalf of appellant, even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 2. In the aforementioned facts of the case, this court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn