Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45481 (KAR)

SMT. GORAMMA v. SMT. THIMMAMMA

WP/30615/2024 · 2025-02-25

H T Narendra Prasad

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8394 WP No. 30615 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 30615 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GORAMMA W/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 2. KUMARA S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 3. PRASANNA S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS ALL ARE R/O KOKKARE HOSAHALLI HUKUNDA POST, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562119. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. SREEDHAR.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. THIMMAMMA D/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O KOKKARE HOSAHALLI UYYAMBALLI HOBLI Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8394 WP No. 30615 of 2024 KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562119 2. SMT. NANJAMMA W/O VENKATAGIRI GOWDA D/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS VADAERA HALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562117. 3. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O PUTTASWAMY D/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 1ST CROSS, BANGALORE ROAD VINAYAKA NAGAR RAMANAGARA TOWN-560093. 4. NANJUNDE GOWDA S/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/O KOKKARE HOSAHALLI UYYAMBALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562119 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED: 28.08.2024 IN O.S.NO.86/2014 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA VIDE ANNEXURE-D AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL AND UNSUSTAINABLE AND GRANT THE PRAYER MADE IN THE APPLICATION FOR REJECTION OF THE PLAINT AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8394 WP No. 30615 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER The office has raised an objection regarding maintainability. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, through video conference, submits that, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum and he will file a memo to that effect. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the sought liberties, if law permits. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32