APHC010034142025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 1964/2025 Between: 1. M MADHU SUDHANA REDDY, S/O M. VASUDEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KONDAREDDYGARIPALLE, PEDDAGOTTIGALLU, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAKALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALLURU P.S, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PULICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 1964/2025 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in highhandedly interfering with the civil disputes and peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property of an extent of Ac.5-15 cents situated at Sy.No.338/5 of 102E Ramireddygaripalli Village, Pulicherla Mandal, Chittoor District, on the ascendancy of the Respondent No.6 herein, without having any power or authority or any jurisdiction and threatening to vacate the possession is questioned as the same is arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the well- established legal principles apart from being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14, 19, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents, not to interfere in petitioners civil disputes regarding the above subject property of an extent of Ac.5-15 cents situated at Sy.No.338/5 of 102E Ramireddygaripalli Village, Pulicherla Mandal, Chittoor District, forthwith.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State. 4 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents are interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent No.6. 4. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State on instructions would submit that respondent/Police will not interfere with the civil dispute between the parties and especially with reference to the petitioner’s property. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Writ Petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself, without going into merits by directing the respondent No.4 to follow due procedure established under law, if they intend to call the petitioner to the Police Station, in connection with any crime or enquiry. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ ___ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 29.01.2025 PSK 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03 WRIT PETITION No: 1964 OF 2025 Date: 29.01.2025 PSK