Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45474 (KAR)

PREMA v. MANJUNATHA

MFA/3336/2023 · 2025-01-20

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3336 OF 2023 BETWEEN PREMA D/O. KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RAMENAHALLI VILLAGE MADHIHALLI HOBLI BELUR TALUK NATURAL GUARDIAN RANGAMMA W/O KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RAMENAHALLI VILLAGE MADIHALLI HOBLI BELUR TALUK. ……..Appellant (By Sriyuths. Aman Nalina Lingesh and Sri. Parvathy R. Nair, Advocates) AND 1. MANJUNATHA S/O ANNEGOWDA AGED MAJOR DODDAMANDIGANAHALLI VILLAGE KANDALI POST KASABHA HOBLI HASSAN DISTRICT (OWNER OF LORRY BEARING REG NO.KA-13-B-4263) MFA.No.3336/2023 -------------------------- 2 2. MANAGER THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY CHANDAN COMPLEX, HARSHA MAHAL ROAD HASSAN (POLICY NO.61070331170100002889 VALID FROM:2.5.2018-7.11.2018) PADMESH S/O RAJAIAH RAMENAHALLI VILLAGE MADHIHALLI HOBLI BELUR TALUK (OWNER OF AUTO BEARING REG.NO.KA-46-6608 AND KA-46-T-3573) DEAD BY LRS 3. JAYAMMA W/O LATE PADMESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 4. ANIL S/O. LATE PADMESH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 5. SUNIL S/O LATE PADMESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS ALL RESIDING AT RAMENAHALLI VILLAGE MADIHALLI HOBLI BELUR TALUK 6. MANAGER CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY MYSORE BRANCH OFFICE 1ST FLOOR, SIGMA COMPLEX NEW KANTHRAJ URS ROAD KUVEMPU NAGAR MYSORE POLICY NO.3368/00758848/000/02 VALID FROM 20.11.2017-19.11.2018 ……Respondents MFA.No.3336/2023 -------------------------- 3 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated 24.01.2023 passed in M.V.C. No. 1624/2018 on the file of the court of SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, BELUR, HASSAN partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Two weeks time is granted to comply with office objections, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.20.01.2025, office objections not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- [[[[[[[[[[[[[ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : BR R By : VL C By : STE