Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4547 (UTT)

UTTARANCHAL STONE CRUSHER LLP THROUGH ITS PARTNER MR. PANKAJ KUMAR S/O LATE DEVI PRAKASH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD SECRETARIAT

WPMS/830/2023 · 2025-09-11

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:7766-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO. 830 OF 2023 Uttaranchal Stone Crusher …...Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & another ….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner : None. Counsel for the State : Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel. JUDGMENT :(per Mr. G. Narendar, C.J.) Case is called. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Even on previous dates of hearing, there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. ________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. ___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dated: 11th September, 2025 NISHANT 1