Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4546 (RAJ)

RAMJILAL @ MOTA S/O SHRI RATANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1162/2025 · 2025-02-05

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5005] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1162/2025 Ramjilal @ Mota S/o Shri Ratanlal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Goner, Police Station Ramnagriya, District Jaipur, Currently Resident Of Haripura, Police Station Narena, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Confined In Jaipur Central Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.4/2025 registered at Police Station Narena, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 121(1) & 132 of BNS. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 121(1) & 132 of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that false case has been registered by the police against the petitioner. Counsel submits that simple case of road accident has been converted into serious criminal offence. Petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2025 and trial will take [2025:RJ-JP:5005] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1162/2025] considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. She submits that nine other cases have been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner; material available on record in the form of charge-sheet; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Ramjilal @ Mota S/o Shri Ratanlal shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording [2025:RJ-JP:5005] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1162/2025] the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /209