IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.1895 of 2025 Decided on : 10.09.2026 Tedhi Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of HP and Ors. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, for Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent(s) : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate Genera. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the wrong respondents have been arrayed; the Public Works Department (PWD) has been impleaded, whereas the petitioner was employed in the Forest Department, as is evident from the judgment sought to be executed. 2. Faced with this situation, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not intend to press the present petition with liberty reserved to file afresh on the same cause of action with appropriate particulars. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes -2- 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioner, as prayed for. 4. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stands disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 10th September, 2026 (Gaurav Rawat)