Kalluri Ramagopal Reddy, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/10951/2025 · 2025-04-27
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45457 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45457 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
r- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRI TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10951 OF 2025 Between: Kalluri Ramagopal Reddy, S/o K.Dastharami Reddy, Age- 64yrs, Occ. Builder, R/oD.No.7/3833-7-21, Flat No.402, Savalli Proddatur Town, Kadapa District Apartment, Srinivasa Nagar, ...Petitioner/s AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District
2. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mydukur, Kadapa District. 4. The Circle Inspector, Rural Police Station Badvel Town, Kadapa District. 5. Peddireddy Amarnath Reddy, S/o Peddireddy Venkata Subba Reddy Resident of Tangedupalli Village, B.Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District. 1 M ' O
6. Singasani Gurumohan. S/o Parandhamaiah Badvel Town, Kadapa District. 7. Godi Venkata Ramana Reddy Tangedupalli Village, B. Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District. 8. Putha Hari Haranath Reddy, S/o Raghunatha Reddy 1-863-1, Anjaneya Nagar, Badvel Town, Kadapa District. Resident of Kota Street, S/o Venkat Reddy, Resident of Resident of D.No.4- ...Respondent/s Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, pleased to issue a writ, order the High Court may be or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly Respondents 3 and 4 iin repeatedly insisting me to appear before their authority and threatening to arrest me, if we do not yield to the terms of Respondents 5 to 8, under the guise of implication of me in false case, as -i 14 and 21 of Constitution of illegal, irregular, irrational and violative of articles India and consequently direct the respondents with my personal life, liberty. not to interfere in any manner lA NO: 1 OF 90'?^ Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly Respondents praying that in the circumstances 3 & 4 not to pay domiciliary visits to my house nor insist me to appear before their authority for settlement of claims of respondents 5 to 8 under the guise of implication of : Petition.
me in false case, pending disposal of the above Writ Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. R SUDHA RANI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 8: — The Court made the following:
■) 1 HN, J W.P.No.10951 2025 APHC010219552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY JHE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10951/2025 Between: Kalluri Ramagopal Reddy ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.RSUDHA RANI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
<' 2 HN, J W.P.No.10951 2025 C The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4**^ respondent, at
1. the behest of respondent Nos.5 to 8, is interfering in civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 to 8, It is submitted that the 8'^ respondent has filed O.S.No.136 of 2018 against the petitioner, which was dismissed for non- th prosecution. However, at the behest of respondent Nos.5 to 8, the 4 respondent is repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station. 2. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State. 3. The writ petition is disposed off, by directing the respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 to 8 without following the due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SOI- A. VENUGOPALA RAO assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION O^ICER The Principal Secretary to Government, State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, Kadapa District. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mydukur, Kadapa District. The Circle Inspector, Rural Police Station, Badvel Town, Kadapa District.
Peddireddy Amarnath Reddy, S/o Peddireddy Venkata Subba Reddy Resident of Tangedupalli Village, B.Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District. Singasani Gurumohan, S/o Parandhamaiah, Resident of Kota Street, Badvel Town, Kadapa District. To,
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 0
7. Godi Venkata Ramana Reddy, Tangedupalli Village, B. Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District. 8. Putha Hari Haranath Reddy, S/o Raghunatha Reddy, Resident of D.No.4- 1-863-1, Anjaneya Nagar, Badvel Town, Kadapa District. 9. One CC to M/S. R SUDHA RANI, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies S/o Venkat Reddy, Resident of
10. 11. sree
HIGH COURT DATED:28/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10951 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P.
WITHOUT COSTS