Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45454 (AP)

SYED KUTUBUDDIN HUSSAINI & 9 ORS v. SYED ZIAUDDIN HUSSAINI@SYED SAJJADA HUSS

SA/646/2002 · 2025-02-09

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

w- APHC010238652002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI I.A.N0.1 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO: 646 OF 2002 Between: 1. Syed Kutubuddin Hussaini, S/o.Syed Ziauddin Hussaini, aged about 74 years, R/o.Penukonda, Anantapur District. 2. Syed Zaheeda Vunnisa (Died) 3. Noor Unnisa, D/o.Late Nazeeruddin, aged about 26 years. 4. Abu Syduddin (Died) 5. Riyazuddin, S/o.Late Nazeeruddin, aged about 18 years. 6. Hameeduddin, S/o.Late Nazeeruddin, aged about 15 years. 7. Khuddus, S/o.Late Nazeeruddin, aged about 14 years. 8. Sabia. 9. Fasiha. 10.Syed Shanawaz, S/o.Late Nazeeruddin. (Through first wife, who is no more), aged about 19 years. (Appellant Nos.8 and 9 are twin daughters of late Nazeeruddin, aged about 11 years) (The Appellants 5 to 9 are minors, under protection of natural Mother and Guardian Appellant No.2) ...Appellants/Appellants/Defendiants AND Syed Ziauddin Hussaini @ Syed Sajjada Hussaini, S/o.Syed Nazmuddin Hussaini, aged about 28 years, Sajjada of Baba Fakruddin Darga of Penukonda, Anantapur District. ...Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff Petition filed under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC read with Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restore the above SA No.646 of 2002 in its original position by set aside the dismissal Order dated 10-02-2025 passed in SA.No.646 of 2002. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Y.N.Vivekananda Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri Y.N.Vivekananda, learned counsel for the petitioners. No counter affidavit filed. Considering the facts and circumstances, the application is ordered”. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Penukonda, Ananthapuramu District. 2. The Civil Judge (Junior Division), Penukonda, Ananthapuramu District. 3. One CC to Sri Y.N.Vivekananda, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati. 6. Two CD copies BSV vna HIGH COURT DATE 0:27/06/2025 Note: After dispatch of this order, file may be sent to Appeal Section for further posting for final hearing. fe 0 5. a)?5 Cumol Section ORDER lA N0.1 OF 2025 IN SA NO. 646 OF m 2002 RESTORING THE APPEAL . «