1 2025:CGHC:2624-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6398 of 2024 Atul Industrial Corporation, Through Its Proprietor, Dhanram Jeswani S/o Late Gurbuxrai, Aged About 68 Years, Occupation-Business, R/o 1425, Dr. Barat Compound, Napier Town, Jabalpur, Tehsil And District- Jabalpur (M.P.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Though Its Secretary And Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaye, Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd. 6th Floor, Tower “C”, Commercial Complex, CBD, Sector-21, Block Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sakti Raj Sinha, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State For Respondent No.2 : : Mr.Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General Mr.Harshal Chauhan, Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.01.16 17:58:04 +0530 2 Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 16.01.2025 1. Heard Mr.Sakti Raj Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr.Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.1 and Mr.Harshal Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following reliefs:- “10.1 Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to decide/consider the representations of the Petitioner dated 16.10.2024, 28.10.2024, 07.11.2024 and 07.11.2024 produced as annexure / 2, 3, 4 & 5. 10.2 Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to delete the condition as mentioned in the Bid / Tender i.e. Annexure P-1 and grant opportunity to the genuine MSME Registered Manufacturing unit i.e. Petitioner. 10.3 Issue a writ in the nature of the mandamus to direct the respondents to amend the condition of the Bid and refloat the Bid duly amended as desired for the benefit of genuine MSME Registered Manufacturing Unit i.e. Petitioner. 3 10.4 Issue a writ in the nature of the mandamus to direct the respondents to cancel The Supply Orders in case placed on the Bidders.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, prays for adjournment on the ground that some outside counsel will argue this matter. 4. Mr.Harshal Chauhan, learned counsel who appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and has filed the return states that the matter has become infructuous as the work order has already been issued on 20.11.2024 and the petitioner has not participated in the Bid. 5. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu