APHC010179022012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9414/2012 Between: 1. M/S.PRUDENTIAL SUGAR CORPORATION LTD,, REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SHRI KVLN BHASWANTH PRUDENTIAL NAGAR, P.O.KOPPADU, NINDRA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR COST MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION (DEPT OF SUGAR & EDIBLE OILS), KRISHI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI- 110 001 2. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS & PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION (DEPT.OF SUGAR & EDIBLE OILS), KRISHI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI- 110 001 3. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing the Order bearing No.SC-II/2011- 2012/AO/March,2012/Andhra Pradesh dated 25.01.2012 directing the Petitioner to supply 4357. MTs of levy sugar on or before 31.03.2012 out of the production of the year 2009-2010 as arbitrary illegal and 2 violative of the petitioner's Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19 and the guarantee under article-340A of the Constitution of India and also the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act and the Levy sugar supply (Control) order, 1979 in the interest of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 11908 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the effect and operation of the impugned Order bearing No.SC-II/2011- 2012/AO/March,2012/Andhra Pradesh dated 25.01.2012 passed by the 1st respondent herein so far as the petitioner is concerned whose name is at Serial No.14 in the impugned Order IA NO: 4 OF 2012(WPMP 51940 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MILIND G GOKHALE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES 3. B SUDHAKAR REDDY AND NEERAJA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Since the main prayer in the writ petition is to supply 4357 MTs of levy sugar on or before 31.03.2012 out of the production of the year 2009-2010, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 3rd September, 2025 cbn 4 252 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.9414 of 2012 3rd September, 2025 cbn