Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4544 (PNJ)

RADHA RANI v. PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION

CWP/10380/2025 · 2026-02-23

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-10380 IN TH 245 Radha Rani Punjab State CORAM: Present : HARPREET 1. of the Consti the nature of (Annexure P P-5) whereby on account rejected in ill the cases of s 2. has been de 1 380-2025 N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGA CWP Date o Rani VERSUS State Warehousing Corporation HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA Mr. Tahaf Bains, Advocate for th Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for t REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present writ petition has be Constitution of India for issuance of ure of certiorari for quashing the imp ure P-8) as well as orders dated 16. hereby the claim of petitioner with re ount of service rendered by her hu d in illegal and arbitrary manner and w es of similarly situated widows. Learned counsel for the parties en decided by of this Court in CW NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH CWP-10380-2025 Date of Decision: February 23, 2026 .....Petitioner SUS ..Responde HARPREET SINGH BRAR e for the petitioner. te for the respondent. been filed under Article 226/227 ce of an appropriate writ or order in he impugned orders dated 09.09.2024 ed 16.11.2022/24.11.2022 (Annexure ith regard to grant of family pension her husband-Tirlok Singh has been and without drawing any inference to parties are ad idem that similar issue CWP-19780-2019 and connected 2026 itioner pondent /227 der in .2024 exure nsion been nce to issue cted PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.02.24 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10380 matters, titl Corporation disposed of in 3. parties, the p (supra) with t 2 380-2025 , titled as Makhan Lal Versus tion, decided on 09.12.2025 and of in terms of the said judgment. In view of the above statement m , the present petition is disposed of in with the following directions:- (i) The Empowered Committ Litigation Policy is hereby direc comprehensive representation a upon the issue raised herein. In shall be at liberty to submit a de her claim within a period of two of a certified copy of this order. (ii) The Committee shall pass after granting an opportunity petitioner, within a period of receipt of certified copy of th receipt of the representation of be. Further, the decision taken th petitioner. Needless to say, if th the relief sought, the same shall rsus Punjab State Warehousing and the present petition may be ment made by learned counsel for the d of in terms of Makhan Lal’s case mmittee constituted under the Punjab directed to treat the writ petition as a tion and to consider and adjudicate rein. In the alternative, the petitioner detailed representation setting out of two weeks from the date of receipt order. ll pass a reasoned and speaking order, rtunity of personal hearing to the d of four months from the date of of this order, or from the date of ion of the petitioner, as the case may aken thereon shall be conveyed to the y, if the petitioner is found entitled to shall be granted to her forthwith. sing ay be or the case unjab n as a dicate itioner ng out eceipt rder, o the ate of ate of e may to the tled to PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.02.24 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10380 4. disposed of. February 23 P.C 3 380-2025 The pending miscellaneous app ed of. 23, 2026 Whether speaking/reasone Whether Reportable. : us application(s), if any, shall also be (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE easoned. : Yes/No Yes/No o be RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.02.24 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document