Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45439 (RAJ)

LAXMI DEVI D/O SHRI JAGAN SINGH W/O SHRI BHARAT SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18197/2025 · 2025-11-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47821] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18197/2025 1. Laxmi Devi D/o Shri Jagan Singh W/o Shri Bharat Singh, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Village Peghor Nagla, Post Khan Penghore, District Bharatpur At Present R/o Village Paprera Tehsil Kumher, District Deeg (Raj.) 2. Sonu Kanwar D/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of E37, Bapu Nagar Sainthi, Chittorgarh (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Commandant, 14Nd Battalion, R.a.c., Pahadi, Bharatpur At Present Camp, 5Th Battalion, R.a.c. Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “(i) By appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may directed to make notional pay fixation of Petitioners and given him seniority from the date of appointment has been given to other persons selected through same process in the larger interest of justice. (ii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, [2025:RJ-JP:47821] (2 of 2) [CW-18197/2025] may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. (iii). Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the Petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for the respondents. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/136