Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45435 (CAL)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. v. DINONATH MONDAL AND ORS

WP.CT/220/2023 · 2025-04-02

Madhuresh Prasad, Supratim Bhattacharya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct. No.4 D/L-1 16.04.2025 (Naba) W.P.C.T. 220 of 2023 Union of India & Ors. Vs. Dinonath Mondal & Ors. Ms. Chandreyi Alam, Ms. Runu Mukherjee ...for the Petitioners/Union of India Mr. Bipul Kumar Mandal ...for the Respondent No.5 Mr. Alauddin Mandal, Mr. Goutam Banerjee ...for the Respondent Nos.1, 3, 4, 7 14, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 20, 28, 30, 33, 34, 35 and 39 1. It is submitted by the learned counsel, Mr. Alauddin Mandal that though he represents respondent nos.1, 3, 4, 7, 14, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 20, 33, 34, 35 and 39, in the order dated 02.04.2025, these respondent numbers are missing due to a typographical error. 2. In view of such submission, we direct that the above noted respondent numbers may also be read as respondents, whom Mr. Alauddin Mandal was representing on 02.04.2025. 3. The order dated 02.04.2025 stands modified, accordingly. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)