Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45434 (ALL)

SIBU v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/13493/2025 · 2025-05-06

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73459 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13493 of 2025 Applicant :- Sibu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amreesh Kumar,Perdeep Kumar Vishnoi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Pradeep Kumar Vishnoi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Alok Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 25 of 2021 (State Vs. Sibu) arising out of Case Crime No. 116 of 2019, under Section 307 of I.P.C., Police Station- Mursan, District Hathras, as well as charge-sheet dated 16.10.2020 including non-bailable warrant order dated 02.05.2022 pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Hathras. Learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the prayer of quashing of entire proceedings of Session Trial as well as charge-sheet and the same is dismissed as not pressed. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that at the time of issuing non-bailable warrants the applicant was on bail. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for appearance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant direct NBW has been issued. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 528 of B.N.S.S is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appear before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Ishan Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad