Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45429 (RAJ)

ARJUN ALIAS PAPPU SON OF RAKESH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13457/2025 · 2025-11-07

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44782] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13457/2025 Arjun Alias Pappu Son Of Rakesh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Basai Samanta, Police Station Sadar, Dholpur (Raj.). (Presently Confined In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/11/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.237/2025 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana (Dholpur), District-Dholpur for offences under Section 80(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the marriage of the deceased with the petitioner was solemnized more than seven years ago, and no child was born from the wedlock. It is submitted that, due to depression, the deceased committed suicide in which petitioner has not played any active role. He further submits that no demand of dowry has been made either by the complainant or by his family members. Petitioner is [2025:RJ-JP:44782] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13457/2025] behind the bars since 25.09.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Arjun Alias Pappu Son Of Rakesh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/37