123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20324-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 21.04.2025 MOHD ASLAM ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. S.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jaspal Singh Guru, AAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for directing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to conclude the investigation and file a report under Section 173 Cr. P.C. in FIR No.67 dated 18.06.2021 Under Sections 420, 120-B IPC at P.S City 1, Distt. Malerkotla in (Annexure P-2). 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla to decide the representation dated 03.03.2025 (Annexure P-3) within a time bound manner. Anuradha 2025.04.24 06:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-20324-2025 2 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 03.03.2025 (Annexure P- 3) by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within three days thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 21.04.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.04.24 06:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document