M. BHAGYAMMA, KURNOOL DIST v. M.D., APGENCO, & ANO
WP/11261/2013 · 2025-04-24
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45425 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45425 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
% IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11261 OF 2013 Between: M. Bhagyamma, D/o Naganna, 26 years, R/o H.No. 38/86, Minchin Bazar, Kurnool, Kurnool District, PIN : 518 001. Ref.
I.D. No. 1000027537, Hall Ticket No. 303169. ...Petitioner AND
1. The A.P.Power Generation Corporation Ltd. Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad -82, Rep. by its Mananging Director,
2. The Chief General Manager (HR), AP. Genco.Limited, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad-82 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ
order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents in issuing the Rejection Letter No. CGM (HR)/DS (O&M) / AS (O&M) / PO.P / PI/32-1/2013, dated 08-04-2013 and in providing the 'Electronic Mechanic' qualification as Educational qualification for the Junior Plant Attendants posts only to the Contract Labour through Note to Paragraph 7 of the Supplemental Notification No.1/ CGM(HR)/2011, dated17- 10-2011, as arbitrary, illegal and voilative of Articles 14,16 & 21 of the Constitution if India and Contrary to the qualifications prescribed in B.P. Ms. No. 1048, Dated 23-09^989 and consequently set aside the
i 1 ’ Rejection Letter No. CGM (HR)/DS (O&M) / AS (O&M) / PO.P / P^32-'' 1/2013, dated 08-04-2013 and direct the respondents to accept the application of the petitioner with 'Electronic Mechanic' qualification for the posts of Junior Plant Attendants and permit to the Trade Test to be held on 13.4.2013 or thereafter in pursuance of the Notification No. / CGM(HR)/2010, dated 5.1.2011 and the Supplemental Notification No. / CGM(HR)/2011, dated 17.10.2011, by reading down the amended qualification mentioned in the Note at paragaraph 7 of the Supplemental Notification dt. 17.10.2011 issued by the 1 the petitioner (Fresh SC Women Candidate) also. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013fWPMP. NO: 13940 OF 20131 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to the Trade Test to held on 13-04-2013 or thereafter, with Electronic Mechanic qualification, pursuant to the Supplemental Notification No.1/ CGM(HR)/2011, dated 17- 10-2011, by reading down the amended qualification mentioned in Note td the Paragraph 7 of the Supplemental Notification No.1/ CGM(HR)/2011, dated 17-10-2011, issued by the 1st respondent to the Fresh Candidates also, by suspending the Rejection Letter No. CGM (HR)/DS (O&M) / AS (O&M) I PO.P / PI/32-1/2013, dated 08-04-2013. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI.
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. CHANDRAIAH SUNKARA Counsel for the Respondents: C RAGHU(SC FOR AP GENCO) The Court made the following: respondent is applicable to
APHC010264652013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) pe4:v [3330] 0 FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11261/2013 Between: M. Bhagyamma ...PETITIONER AND AP Power Generation Corporation Limited and another ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CHANDRAIAH SUNKARA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.C RAGHU(SC FOR AP GENCO) 2.- The Court made the following: I
7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.11261 of 2013
ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting her case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. i 1 //TRUE COPY// /W SECTION OFFICER To, SRI. CHANDRAIAH SUN KARA Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to
2. One CC to SRI. C RAGHU(SC FOR AP GENCO) Advocate [OPUC]
3. Three CD Copies ksr
HIGH COURT DATED;25/04/2025
ORDER WP.No.11261 of 2013 dismissing the writ petition without costs FOR NON-PROSECUTION