Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45423 (RAJ)

AADIL KHAN S/O MAQSOOD KHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15882/2025 · 2025-12-03

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49051] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15882/2025 Aadil Khan S/o Maqsood Khan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Maakhar, Police Station Bagar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Choudhary Ms. Manisha Yogi For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Gaurav Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.188/2025 registered at Police Station Bagar, District Jhunjhunu for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2) 3(5) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that both the parties have settled the dispute by amicable settlemen+ 9t. There is no medical opinion by which any injury can be termed as dangerous to life. He further contends that petitioner is behind the bars since 24.11.2025 without any criminal past. The [2025:RJ-JP:49051] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15882/2025] trial of the case will take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has admitted the factum of the compromise and has stated that complainant has no objection if petitioner be released on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Aadil Khan S/o Maqsood Khan be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR I),J Chandan/112