Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45412 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA @ LADEN S/O SHRI BHAGWANARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6783/2025 · 2025-11-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44956] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6783/2025 1. Mahendra @ Laden S/o Shri Bhagwanaram, R/o Adarsh Nagar Manda (Madani) Police Station Khatushyam Ji Sadar District Sikar (Raj.) 2. Kailash Pawanda S/o Shri Rugharam, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Dhani Pawanda Ki Dhani Tan Bawadi Police Station Reengus District Sikar (Raj.). 3. Tejpal S/o Shri Ramkaran Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Dukiya Police Station Khatushyamji District Sikar (Raj.) 4. Vikas S/o Shri Nathuram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Manda (Madani) Police Station Khatushyam Ji Sadar District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma for Mr. K. K. Bhinda For State For Complainant : : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Atish Jain HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 12/2025 registered at Police Station Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 324(4), 324(4), 324(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that vide order dated 09.06.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicants. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that compromise has been taken place inter se the complainant and applicants. 3. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for the complainant has not refuted the fact that compromise proceedings are going on. [2025:RJ-JP:44956] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6783/2025] 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that the compromise has been taken place inter se the parties and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 09.06.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Khatushyamji Sadar District Sikar in FIR No. 12/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants 1. Mahendra @ Laden S/o Shri Bhagwanaram, 2. Kailash Pawanda S/o Shri Rugharam, 3. Tejpal S/o Shri Ramkaran Singh and 4. Vikas S/o Shri Nathuram, shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade themselves from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /241