[2025:RJ-JP:47751] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17977/2025 1. Tarun Kumar Garg S/o Sita Ram, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Bagh Ka Darwaja Bagdi Nagar, Tehsil Sojat, Dist. Pali Rajasthan. At Present Posting Gsss Siyat, Dist. Pali. 2. Bajrang Lal S/o Lchman Ram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Rajpura, Post Balara, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar, At Present Posting Gsss Balodbadi, Block Fathepur, Dist. Sikar 3. Rajesh Gaur S/o Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 86 Mansoorwar Colony Old Housing Board Dist. Pali, At Present Posting Gsss Dhabar, Block Rohat, Dist. Pali. 4. Kishoree Lal S/o Madan Lal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o E- 155 Baldev Colony Mertacity, Dist. Nagaur. At Present Working Gsss Tunkiya, Block Merta City, Dist. Nagaur 5. Chhotu Ram Choudhary S/o Ram Karan, Aged About 61 Years, R/o 574/02 Near Parasar Tent Housing Opposite Rie Pushkar Road Ganpati Nagar, Ajmer, Dist. Ajmer. 6. Rajendra Kumar S/o Juhar Singh, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Village And Post Sewadi, Tehsil Bali, Dist. Pali. At Present Posting Gsss Shrimati Hulasibai Bastimal Siroya No. 1 Bali, Dist. Pali. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Department Of Education, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner 3. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner 4. The Joint Director, Education Department, Pali Zone Pali. 5. The District Elementary Officer, (Secondary/elementary),pali. 6. The District Elementary Officer, (Secondary/elementary),beawar. 7. The District Elementary Officer, (Secondary/elementary),sikar. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:47751] (2 of 3) [CW-17977/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhraj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioners may kindly be allowed: - A. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, may kindly be direct the respondents to grant to petitioners summer vacation dues payment date of initially appointment at the respective period and the petitioners by counting their service from the date of their initial appointment with all consequential benefits; B. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, that the said controversy already covered in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek (Supra) C. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. D. Writ petition filed by the petitioners may kindly be allowed with costs.”.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 10.07.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13104/2025 “Kavita Solanki Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, at Principal [2025:RJ-JP:47751] (3 of 3) [CW-17977/2025] Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Kavita Solanki (supra) passed by this Court on the basis of judgments in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan: S.B. CWP No. 3534/2009 decided on 20.01.2014. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Kavita Solanki (supra) and Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. The State of Rajasthan: SBCWP No. 3534/2009 on 20.01.2014 with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /206