[2025:RJ-JP:49783] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 15765/2025 Suresh Chand S/o Punyaram, R/o Maliyo Ki Dhani, Motuka, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa. (At Present Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Shankar Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/12/2025 1. The present 4th bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Suresh Chand S/o Punyaram, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.395/2022 dated 24.06.2022 registered at P.S. Bandikui District - Dausa, for the offence under Sections 147, 447, 323, 341, 307 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time. Learned counsel for the [2025:RJ-JP:49783] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15765/2025] 3. Learned petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.07.2022 and the post mortem report indicate that the Doctor has noticed post operation one stitch wound, which does not indicate that the injures is caused by any sharp edged weapon. He further submits that the trial has not been concluded so far and still the petitioner is in custody. He also submits that the petitioner need a bail so as to settle his family which is at verge of starvation. He also submits that if Hon’ble Court consider the petitioner should be granted interim bail for a period of two months. 4. Aforesaid contentions are opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and he submits that the petitioner is charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 326, 427, 341, 307 and 302 of IPC and the deadly assault is made by the present petitioner. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. First bail application of the present petitioner was dismissed on 18.09.2023 whereas second bail application was dismissed on 24.10.2024. The petitioner has filed third bail application before this Court and same was dismissed on 26.08.2025. Now the fourth bail application is filed. 7. The petitioner has filed an interim bail before the trial Court which was dismissed on 12.11.2025. The facts narrated herein clearly indicate that the petitioner was arrested on 03.07.2022 and since then he is in custody. 8. The prosecution evidence has already concluded and the matter is fixed for recording statement of petitioner under [2025:RJ-JP:49783] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15765/2025] Section 351 of BNSS. The sessions case is at fag end of the trial. Considering the grounds and also the fact that the present petitioner is the main accused, who allegedly assaulted the deceased with farsa, is not entitled to be released on bail. 9. The facts and the material indicate that the alleged offence are of serious nature and role attributed to applicant is prima facie sufficient to consider complicity of applicant in the crime. Therefore, at this juncture, considering the evidence collected so far, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant accused on bail. 10. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicant accused at this stage. 11. Accordingly, the 4th application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by the applicant-accused Suresh Chand S/o Punyaram is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/1