- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48737 WP No. 13465 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 13465 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. RANGASHETTY S/O KENCHASHETTY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 2. REVANNASHETTY S/O KENCHASHETTY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 3. KUMARASHETTY S/O KENCHASHETTY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS ALL ARE R/O KADABAHALLI VILLAGE BINDAGANAVILLE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 448. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVAMURTHY.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48737 WP No. 13465 of 2023 PANDAVAPURA DIVISION PANDAVAPURA MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434. 3. THASILDAR K R PETE TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 426. 4. MALAYYA S/O LATE RANGAIAH @ KAMALAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 5. RAJEGOWDA S/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS 6. RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE NINGEGOWDA @ KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 6 ARE R/O KADABAHALLI VILLAGE BINDIGANAVILLE HOBLI NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DIST-571 448. 7. NAGESH R., S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A NO.1109, 6TH MAIN 18TH CROSS, SECTOR-7, HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN R.MISC (NAA) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48737 WP No. 13465 of 2023 139/2021-22 PENDING ON THE FILE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PADAVANAPURA SUB DIVISION, PADAVAPURA VIDE ANNEXURE-J TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called out. 2. This Court vide order dated 14.11.2025 has passed the following order; "Office objections have not been complied with, despite several opportunities granted. It is made clear that if office objections are not cleared by the next date of hearing, the Court would be constrained to pass appropriate orders. List this matter in 'orders' list for dismissal on 25.11.2025." 3. Today also counsel for the petitioners is absent when the matter is called out. This would clearly indicate that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48737 WP No. 13465 of 2023 matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69