[2025:RJ-JP:43745] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.5760/2025 Pradeep Singh S/o Shakti Singh Rajput, Aged About 39 Years, R/o P. 157 Ganesh Nagar, Kalwar Road, Jothwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 31/10/2025 1. By way of filing this petition, a challenge has been led to the recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner lodged an FIR No.204/2009 registered at Police Station Kishangarh against the accused under Sections 384 & 323 IPC, and subsequently, the vehicle of the petitioner was seized by the police. Learned counsel submits that an application seeking supurdagi of the said vehicle on supurdaginama was submitted, and the same was allowed on 05.11.2009 with a condition that he would furnish registration certificate of the vehicle within a period of 15 days along-with an affidavit. Learned counsel submits that aforesaid order could not be complied within the stipulated time, thereafter the petitioner got the registration of the said vehicle in the year 2012. Learned counsel submits that FIR submitted by the [2025:RJ-JP:43745] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5760/2025] petitioner resulted in a final report negative by the concerned police station by stating the dispute is of a civil nature and final report submitted by the Police was accepted by the court below. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that inspite of above, the trial court has initiated the recovery proceedings against the petitioner, hence, interference of this Court is warranted. 4. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner is supposed to approach the Court concerned by way of filing appropriate application narrating all above facts and circumstances by annexing relevant documents in support of his application. 5. If such application is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court within a period of two weeks from today, it is expected from the trial court to decide the same strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously as early as possible. 6. For a period of two weeks, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/25