IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTYTHIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE •' PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9669 OF 2025 Between: Datia Perinaidu, S/o Yarramnaidu Late, Age 75 years, R/o Kottapeta village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Srikakulam District, 3. The Sub Collector cum, Revenue Divisional Officer, Tekkali Revenue Division, Tekkali, Srikakulam District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. ...RESPONDENTS y Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature in WRIT Df MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of the 4th Respondent Tahsildar in not considering the Petitioner’s Representation Dated 21.10.2024 for mutating his name and details of lands in online web land records and issue of Pattadar pass books, IB records and Adangals in respect to land in Sy No 275-13 an extent of AC 0.12 V2 cents and Sy No 275-16A an extent of Ac 0.61 14 cents situated at Kistupuram revenue Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District which is illegal, unjust, arbitrary, and contrary to law and violations of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary Articles 300-A, 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider Petitioner's Representation Dated 21.10.2024 and mutate Petitinoers' name and details of lands in online web land records and issue of Pattadar pass books, 1B records and Adangals in respect to land in Sy No 275- 13 an extent of AC.0.12 14 cents and Sy No 275-16A an extent of Ac 0.61 14 cents situated at Kistupuram revenue Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. / lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider Petitioner’s Representation Dated 21.10.2024 and mutate Petitinoers’ name and details of lands in online web land records and issue of Pattadar pass books, IB records and Adangals in respect to land in Sy No 275- 13 an extent of AC.0.12 14 cents and Sy No 275-16A an extent of Ac 0.61 14 cents situated at Kistupuram revenue Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE ^ The Court made the following Order: / APHC010176842025 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9669/2025 Between: Datia Perinaidu, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9669/2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief; “ may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature in WRIT of MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of the 4'^ Respondent Tahsildar in not considering the Petitioner’s Representation Dated 21.10.2024 for mutating his name and details of lands in online web land records and issue of Pattadar pass books, IB records and Adangals in respect to land in Sy No 275-13 an extent of AC 0.121/2 cents and Sy No 275-16A an extent of Ac 0.611/2 cents situated at Kistupuram revenue Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District which is illegal, unjust, arbitrary, and contrary to law and violations of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary Articles 300-A, 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider Petitioner’s Representation Dated 21.10.2024 and mutate Petitioner’s name and details of lands in online web land records and issue of Pattadar pass books, IB records and Adangals in respect to land in Sy No 275- 13 an extent of AC.0.121/2 cents and Sy No 275-16A an extent of Ac 0.611/2 cents situated at Kistupuram revenue Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District and to pass such ” Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant 2. Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the lands in Sy.No.275-13 to an extent of Ac.0.121/2 cents and Sy.No.275-16A, admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.61i/2 3. 3 cents at Kistupuram Revenue Village, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District, through a family settlement vide settlement deed dated 28.03.2023. Since then, he has been in possession of the subject property. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the 4. petitioner’s father name was mutated in the revenue records as pattadar in respect of the subject lands and an endorsement vide Rc.No.68/2023, dated 22.12.2023 was issued by the 4^*^ respondent by conforming the same. But, due to the resurvey conducted recently by the revenue officials, the name of the petitioner was not considered and mutated in respect of the subject lands. For which, the petitioner submitted a representation to the 4*'^ respondent on 21.10.2024. Even after having partition between the brothers on succession of property from their father, the respondents neither mutated the name of the \ petitioner nor issued any other proceedings. Hence, the Writ Petition. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for 5. Revenue furnished a copy of written instructions issued by the 4'^ respondent vide Rc.No.481/2025 A, dated 19.04.2025, wherein, the relevant paragraphs are extracted hereunder: / further submit that the petitioner Sri Datia Parinaidu S/o Late Yerramnaidu has submitted representation to this office for issuance of pattadar passbook for the land for an extent of Ac 0.12 y2 cents in Sy.No 275-13 and extent of Ac 0.61 >2 cents in Sy.No. 275-16A of Kistupuram Village, despite the fact there is an existing partition dispute between the petitioner and his daughters over the said land. It is further submitted that the petitioner has only submitted representations for issuance of pattadar passbooks for the land for an 4 extent of Ac 0.12 in Sy.No 275-13 and extent of Ac 0.61 >2 cents in Sy.No. 275-16A of Kistupuram Village and accordingly an endorsement was issued to the petitioner i.e., Sri Datia Perinaidu S/o Yerramnaidu informing for applying for mutation application through GSH^S / Mee- Seva. But the petitioner has not applied for the mutation application through GS14/S / Mee-Seva so far, which is the valid process of applying for mutation. \ \ Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the 6. petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this f Court is of the view that the dispute pertains, is to the manner in which the petitioner has sought relief, specifically, whether such relief can be requested through a representation or through an application under Form 6A, as contemplated under the Rules. 7. In response, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the resurvey, the petitioner is unable to make an application in Form 6A, as required. As such, he submitted a written representation to the respondents. 8. In view of the same, this Court is of the considered view that the present th Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the petitioner to approach the 4 respondent and to submit that either 6A application or detailed representation along with payment particulars of requisite fee within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. After the receipt of the same, the 4**^ respondent herein is directed to consider the same and pass a speaking order after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and other stake holders, if any, within a period of two (02) months thereafter. 5 -9. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no orders as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, Petition shall stand closed. if any, pending in the writ Sd/- V. SAVITHRI GOWRI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFTICER ^SECTION To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Srikakulam District 3. The Sub Collector cum. Revenue Divisional Officer, Tekkali Revenue Division, Tekkali, Srikakulam District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kotabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District. 5. One CC to SRI. S SRINIVASA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies vna HIGH COURT \ DATED:23/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.9669 of 2025 12 JUN 2075 m a ”*7 ^ . Curreni Section DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS