[2025:RJ-JP:51817] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19723/2025 1. Balistar S/o Sant Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Singhrawali, Post Kot, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2. Virendra Singh S/o Balram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Khedli Gurjar, Tehsil Hindauncity, District Karuali, Rajasthan. 3. Hari Mohan Tanvar S/o Bhagvan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhikki Ka Pura (Churali), Post Khedli Gurjar, Tehsil Hindauncity, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 4. Rajesh Kumar Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Khedli Gurjar, Tehsil Hindauncity, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Headquarter, Bharatpur. 4. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education) Headquarter, Deeg. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:51817] (2 of 3) [CW-19723/2025] “i. by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, Respondents may kindly be directed to change the place of posting of petitioners from District Deeg to District Bharatpur on the post of Teacher Gr. III Level 1. ii. by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, Respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation and thereby given posting to the petitioners in District Bharatpur as after creation of new district Deeg the working district of petitioners comes. under Deeg whereas the petitioners are resident of Bharatpur. iii. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:51817] (3 of 3) [CW-19723/2025] petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/452