Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45384 (CHH)

VIJAY KUMAR SAHU v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3072/2025 · 2025-10-08

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:50266-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3072 of 2025 Vijay Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Lekhram Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Ekta Colony, Ashok Nagar, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). ... Petitioner(s) versus The State Of Chhattisgarh Through-Station House Officer, P.S. Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 09.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. Sandeep Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Saumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quashed the First information BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR 2 Report bearing No. 1293/2025 (Annexure-P/1), registered at Police Station Sarkanda on dated 17.09.2025 u/s 318 (4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of BNS, 2023 against the present petitioner namely Vijay Kumar Sahu in the interest of Justice. 2. That, any other relief(s) which the Hon'ble Court deems fit & proper may kindly be pleased to granted in favour of the petitioners;” 3. From perusal of the prayers and pleadings made in the instant petition, it transpires that the petitioner has not made the complainant as party respondent, which goes to show that the petition drafted by learned counsel for the petitioner is in a very casual manner and further wasted the precious time of the Court, as such, in the opinion of this Court, the petition is defective one. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone with liberty to file afresh petition with appropriate prayer, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Special School for Intellectually Retarded Girls, Gaganpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG). 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed with this petition shall be returned to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining the photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu