[2025:RJ-JP:48053] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18067/2025 1. Dr. Suresh Choudhary S/o Shri Shrawan Choudhary, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, Amanipura Dansroli, District Sikar Rajasthan. 2. Dr. Sunita Lamb D/o Shri Kurda Ram Lamba, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Om Nagar Ward No. 39, Radha Krishnapur, District Sikar Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Director, Department Of Medical And Health, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Sikar. 4. Block Chief Medical Officer, Danta, District Sikar. 5. Community Health Center, Bay, District Sikar Through Its Medical Officer In Charge. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction thereby in the nature thereof the impugned orders dated 7.11.2025 and whole action of the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to grant extension and allow the petitioners to render their [2025:RJ-JP:48053] (2 of 3) [CW-18067/2025] duties as Medical Officer on UTB till duly selected candidate is available. b) Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 15.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20389/2025 (Dr. Himanshu Thakan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. Prakhar Jain on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is liable for disposal in light of Dr. Himanshu Thakan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove, but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or [2025:RJ-JP:48053] (3 of 3) [CW-18067/2025] through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/120