SOM PRAKASH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH D.M DISTRICT HARIDWAR
WPMS/2993/2017 · 2025-02-28
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4538 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4538 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2019:UHC:15878 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2993/2017 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. None appears for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
3. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 and 5 / Bank.
4. Mr. Rajendra Arya, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the auction purchaser.
5.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since the auction proceedings have already been finalized and sale deed has already been executed in favour of auction purchaser, therefore, by efflux of time, present writ petition has become infructuous.
6. In view of the above submissions, present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 28.02.2025 SKS