Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45379 (AP)

K.GUNASEKHAR, CHITTOOR DIST. v. PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT., HYD & 4 OTHERS

WP/11508/2016 · 2025-04-24

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FIRDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11508 OF 2016 Between: K.Gunasekhar, S/o. Munuswamy, Hindu, Occ; outsourcing typist O/o Tahsildar, S.R. Puram Mandal, Chittoor District, R/o. 49, Kothapalli Mite Village and Post, S.R. Puram Mandal, Chittoor District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Bldgs, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor, Chittoor District 4. The Tahsildar, S.R. Puram Mandal, Srirangarajapuram, Chittoor District 5. Unique Service Consultants, Rep. its. Proprietor, D. No. 8-211 New Balaji Colony, M.R. Palli Road, Tirupathi-517502, Chittoor District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ order qr direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to debiare the action of the respondents 2 to 4 may in terminating the petitioner from his service as out sourcing typist in the 4th respondent's office without dhy notice vide Proceedings ROC /4089/2015 Dt. 14.8.2015 and Dt. 15.12.2015 A3 / as illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14, and 21 of the Constitution of India besides being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same as illegal in the interest of justice I.A. NO: 2 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 14495 OF 201 fi) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as out sourcing typist in the 4th respondent's office by suspending the proceedings 2nd respondent passed in ROC A3 /4089/2015 Dt. 14.8.2015 and Dt. 15.12.2015 pending disposal of WP In the interest of justice I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP. NO: 243fi OF dnifi) Between: 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Princioal Department, Secretariat Bldgs; Saifabad, Hydera^bad. ^ 2. The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor, Chittoor District 4. The Tahsildar, S.R. Puram Mandal, Srirangarajapuram ...Petitioners/Respondents No.1 to 4 of the Revenue Chittoor District AND ^' TahSr® S r' Pur. outsourcing typist O/o Village and Posrs^R^’p^urat^a'^n'li^rihiitoSfbrsS^ ...Respondent/Petitioner ...Respondents/Respondent No.5 (R2 is not a necessary party to this petition) Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim ordef (granted on 07-04-2016 in WP MP No. 14495 of 2016 in WP No. 11508 of 2016. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T C KRISHNAN (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondents No.f to 4: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: Order APHC010077762016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11508/2016 [3504] / ] Between: K.gunasekhar, Chittoor Dist. ...PETITIONER AND PrI Secretary Revenue Dept Hyd 4 Others and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following Order: ...RESPONDENT(S) On 17.04.2025, none appeared for the petitioner. As such, the instant case is directed to be listed today under the caption for dismissal”. Despite the same, today also none appeared for the petitioner to represent the lis. I 2 % 2. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER 1- One CC to SRI T C I FOR 3. Three CD Copies KRISHNAN Advocate tOPUC] revenue (AP), High Court OfAndhra Pradesh gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 25/04/2025 \ ORDER WP.No.11508 of 2016 (P o\ s 2 9 SEP 2025 ^ . Current Section . DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS