Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45375 (KAR)

PUTTAGOWRI v. KAYDIL TAYIL NARMENA

MFA/5332/2023 · 2025-01-20

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5332 OF 2023 BETWEEN 1. PUTTAGOWRI S/O LATE RAMANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS (MINOR) 2. MANU S/O LATE RAMANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS (MINOR) (APPELLANT 1 AND 2 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR ELDER FATHER GUARDIAN SRI.PRAKASH NAYAKA S/O PUTTARAMANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS) ALL ARE R/AT GOVINDANAHALLI NELLURU PALA POST, HUNSURU TQ MYSURU DISTRICT. ……..Appellants (Sri. S.A. SABOOR, Advocate) AND 1. KAYDIL TAYIL NARMENA W/O SHAJIR BARYL, MAJOR R/AT 1ST AALLA MANJIL, IQRA SCHOOL TEMPLE GATE, KANNURU THALACHERI KERALA. 2. THE MANAGER UNIVERSAL SAMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD MFA.No.5332/2023 -------------------------- 2 363, GURUKAL DEVANNA ROAD, AGRAHARA, PORT MOHALLA MYSURU. ……Respondents This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated 28.06.2022 passed in M.V.C. No. 243/2020 on the file of the III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND MACT, MYSURU partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Three weeks time is granted to comply with office objections, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.20.01.2025, office objections not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- [[[[[[[[[[[[[ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : BR R By : VL C By : STE