1 2025:CGHC:39328 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 475 of 2023 1 - Rajendra Singh Gandhi S/o Late Barkat Singh Gandhi Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Raigarh, Mainroad District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Urban Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Secretary Transport Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chhattisgarh Insrastructure Development Corporation Through Its Managing Director, C.I.D.C. Shastri Chowk, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Municipal Officer Municiple Council, Shiorinarayan District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.P. S.Gandhi, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Prateek Singh Thakur, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Mukesh Rathiya, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ali Asgar, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/08/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “i. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the entire records in respect of decision taken by the Government for absorption of the services of the employee of the erstwhile MPSRTC who are working on deputation in different department as well as Corporation. ii. This Hon'ble Court a set-a-side the order dated 29.03.2022 passed by the Respondent Authorities be pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to 3 consider the absorption of their services in their respective departments. iii. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the State Government to grant permission for absorption of the service of the petitioner. iv. Any other relief as deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court..” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner was retired on 30.06.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat