DR. GOPINATH HARISHANKAR TIWARI v. MR. DHIRAJ KUMAR, SECRETARY, DEPT. OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, MUMBAI AND ORS.
CP/100/2025 · 2026-09-09
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4537 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4537 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Order cp 100.2025.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Contempt Petition No. 100 of 2025 in Writ Petition No. 7244 of 2022 (D) [Dr. Gopinath Harishankar Tiwari vs. Mr. Dhiraj Kumar, Secretary, Department of Medical Educationj and Research and ors.] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R. V. Shiralkar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. N. R. Patil, AGP for the State/respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. V. H. Pandey, Advocate for respondent no. 3
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
DATE : 09-09-2026. Heard.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the order of which contempt is alleged is being complied with. The necessary proposal has been forwarded to the Accountant General and payment including non-practising allowance will also be reflected in the pension and same will be released in due course. He further submits that because of confusion as regards date of retirement of the petitioner, the order could not be complied in time. He submits that there is no intention of disobeying the order. He has assured that the order will be complied as early as possible. The statement is accepted. 2026:BHC-NAG:12036-DB
Order cp 100.2025.odt 2
3. In the circumstances, it appears that the case falls in the category of disobedience of the order but not wilful disobedience. That being so and since the purpose of filing petition has been served to large extent, we dispose of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to revive the prayer, if contingency so arises. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) wasnik Signed by: Mr. A. Y. Wasnik Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 10/09/2026 17:49:50