Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45368 (KAR)

SRI DINESHKUMAR U v. MUNIRAJ D

CRP/500/2021 · 2025-11-25

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48857 CRP No. 500 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 500 OF 2021 (SC) BETWEEN: SRI DINESHKUMAR U AGED 30 YEARS R/AT NO 231/A, WEST COLONY, RWF QUAERTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE- 560 064 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KEMPARAJU., ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: MUNIRAJ D S/O LATE DORAIRAJ AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO 150, LBS NAGAR YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE- 560 064 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HALESHA R G., ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.10.2019 PASSED IN SC.No.622/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE C/c XXIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, BENGALURU DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48857 CRP No. 500 of 2021 ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner. Sri Halesha R.G., learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memo dated 25.11.2025, which reads as under: "Since the petitioner paid the award/decree amount in Ex.Petition No.194/2020, the above Civil Revision Petition is not sustainable. Hence, it may be dismissed as infructuous in the interest of justice and equity." 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the said memo, the civil revision petition is dismissed. However, if there is any cause to continue the revision petition, the revision petitioner is at liberty to revive the petition by filing necessary application. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26