Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45367 (AP)

Sheik Sayeed Ahmad v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/10901/2025 · 2025-04-28

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10901 OF 2025 Between: Sheik Sayeed Ahmad, S/o. Sheikh Abdul Rahman Aged about 67 years, Occ; President, Anjuman Minority CarTTimunity hall Development Society, R/o. H.No.41/294, Kothapeta, KurriooLCtty; Kurnool District-518001, A.P. • ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its PrI. Secretary, Minorities Welfare Department, SebretaildtLArnaravathi, A.P. 2. The Andhra Pradesh State Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, First Floor, 0pp. KR Market, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. - 520001 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Board, 4th and 5th Floor, Imdad Ghdr,' Opp. KR Market, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. - 520001 4. The Inspector Auditor, Waqf Board, Kurnool District, At Collectorate, Kurnool, A.P. 5. The Caretaker Committee Police Line Masjid, Near ll-Town P.S., Kurnool, Rep. by its Presii^^Shaik Younus Basha. S/o Sheikh Gafur Sahib Kurnool City, KurnddfrAP ■j - ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature j' , of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to demolish the structure by dispossessing the petitioner from the Shaadi Khana situated in Sy.No.140/B2 at Kothapeta area, Kurnool District, A.P. as illegal, unlawful and against the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from 2^J^hapeta and the Shaadi Khana situated in Sy.No.140/B2 District, A.P. area, Kurnool lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the Shaadi Khana situated in Sy.No.140/B2 at Kothapeta area, Kurnool District, A.P. pending disposal of main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BALAIAH B Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: SRI SHAIK KHAJA BASHA (SC FOR AP WAQF BOARD) Counsel for the Respondent No.5: — The Court made the following: ORDER & APHCOI 0208782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdictio twenty NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE WRIT petition NO: inQni^^ooc; SliiS PRADESH * [3331] n) FIVE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Between: Sheik Sayeed Ahmad ■..petitioner AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.BALAIAH B and Others ■■■RESPONDENT(S) ( Counsel for the Respondent(S): TCP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following ORDER: / Heard Sri B.Balaiah. learned Khaza Basha, learned respect of the 5*'’ counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shaik respondents 2 to 4. Notice in standing counsel for 2- The above writ petition i trying to dispossess the Sy.No.140/B2 at Kothapeta IS filed to declare the action petitioner from the Shaadi Khana si area, Kurnool District of the respondents - situated in as illegal and arbitrary. 3. In the affidavit, it the administration of the Shaadi in fact, is threatening the was averred that the 5*^ respondent is interfering with Khana. The Committee of the S'" respondent, petitioner to vacate the Shaadi Khana function hall. 2 In Para No.8 of the affidavit, it was stated that the 3'^'^ respondent is trying to dispossess the petitioner and demolish the property illegally with the support of political influence. Learned standing counsel, on instructions, would submit that the 3'^^ respondent is neither interfering with the petitioner’s possession nor taking any steps to demolish the subject property. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on both sides directing the 3"^^ respondent not to interfere with the affairs of the Shaadi Khana function hall situated in Sy.No.140/B2 at Kothapeta area, Kurnool District, without following due process of law. No order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTI //TRUECOPY// ^iSf^FICER To, Welfare Department, Secretariat, Off?rer"Fi'ret Set^VHavaw®ri’ ‘i’f ' h 520001 Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. - and 5th Floor,^l'mdad^GS ^pp'^^KR^Ivllfkef District, A.P.-520001 [RPAD] Market, Vijayawada, Krishna 4. The Inspector Auditor Kurnool, A.P. Waqf Board, Kurnool District, At Collectorate, "-Town P.S. Sahib Kurnool City, KurnoorA.p ^ ^o^nus Basha. S/o Sheikh Gafur [OPUC] :ial Welfare, High Court of Andhra 6. One CC to Sri Balaiah B Advocate ^ [OuVf Pradesh. 8. Three CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10901 of 2025 I 25JUN 2025 | ^ . Current Secnon STAGE OF ADMISSION, WITHOUT COSTS