APHC010881942018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42938 OF Between: 1 G. Snnivas Rao, S/o. Late G. Padmanabam, Aged about 43 years Occ Field AssistanL Gollamulgam Gram Panchayat, Cheepurupalli Mandal Vizianagaram District. 2. Vujjuru Viswanadham, S/o V.Tavitayya Aged Assistant, Mettapalli Gram Panchayat, Vizianagaram District. ^ As^stenf' U Narayana, Aged about years, Occ. Field “glam Di^lr""" about years, Occ. Field Cheepurupalli Mandal / ...Petitioners / AND Development Officer/The Programme Officer, Mahatma M:r:,:rai3r IdditilTp* Management Authority Add, lonal Programme Co-Ordinator, Mahatma Gandhi Nationa^ural 3 ThTofs^ err'" ''^^--garam Dis« ' National Rurl T'' ! Co-Ordinator, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme Vizianagaram District and Vizianagaram ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.2, Project Director issuing Removal orders to the petitioners/Field Assistants vide his proceedings in RCNos.4340/2016/PE/DVC dated 09.04.2018, without giving an opportunity for their explanation and without any enquiry violating Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and the principles of natural justice as illegal, arbitrary and it is further consequentially prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to set aside the same and to direct the respondent No.2, to reinstate the petitioners as Field Assistants. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to forthwith permit the Petitioners to join their duties as Field Assistants at Gollalamulagam, Ramalingapuram and Mettapalli Gram Panchayaths, Cheepurupalli Mandal, Vizainagaram District, Andhra Pradesh respectively duly suspending the proceedings of the Respondent No.2 in RC No. 4340/2016/P E/DVC dated 09.04.2018. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI MURALI KRISHNA KAVITI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: SRI M S R CHANDRA MURTHY SC FOR MGNREGS Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL dev The Court made the following order: APHC010881942018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42938/2018 Between: i.G. SRiNiVASKAO, S/O. LATE G.PADMANABAM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. FIELD ASSISTANT, CHEEPURUPALLI MANDAL, GOLLAMULGAM GRAM VIZIANAGARAM PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT. 2.VUJJURUVISWANADHAM, YEARS, OCC. FIELD PANCHAYAT, CHEEPURUPALLI MANDAL DISTRICT. 3.UDARAVALLIRAMU, S/O. LATE U.NARAYANA YEARS, OCC. FIELD ASSISTANT PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT. S/O.V.TAVITAYYA, AGED ABOUT ASSISTANT, METTAPALLI GRAM VIZIANAGARAM AGED ABOUT RAMALINGAPURAM GRAM CHEEPURUPALLI MANDAL,VIZIANAGARAM ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE MANDAL DEVEPOLMENT OFFICER/THEPROGRAMME OFFICER, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT MANDAL, GUARANTEE SCHEME VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR. DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND ADDITIONAL PROGRAMME CO-ORDINATOR MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL GUARANTEE SCHEME, DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COORDINATOR, MAHATMA EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, AP. GUNTUR DISTRICT. CHEEPURUPALLI RURAL EMPLOYMENT VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM AND PROGRAMME GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL SCHEME, VIZIANAGARAM, ...RESPONDENT(S): 9 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.2, Project Director issuing Removal orders to the petitioners/Field RCNOS.4340/2016/PE/DVC dated Assistants vide his 09.04.2018 proceedings without giving an opportunity for their explanation and without any enquiry violating Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and the principles of natural justice as illegal, arbitrary and it is further consequentially prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to set aside the same and to direct the respondent No.2, to reinstate the petitioners as Field Assistants and in pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): I.Murali Krishna Kaviti Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.M S R CHANDRA MURTHY 2. 3.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: .... to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.2, Project Director issuing Removal orders to the petitioners/Field one Assistants vide his proceedings in RCNOS.4340/2016/PE/DVC dated 09.04.2018, without giving an opportunity for their explanation and without any enquiry violating Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and the principles of natural justice as illegal, arbitrary and it is further consequentially prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to set aside the same and to direct the respondent No.2, to reinstate the petitioners as Field Assistants and pass ...." 2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioners. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption "For dismissal represented for the Petitioners today. , none 4. Learned Special Standing Counsel and Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents are in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P VINOU KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To/' 1. One CC to Sri. Murali Krishna Kaviti Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. M S R Chandra Murthy SC for MGNREGS [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Dev, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT 4. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:09/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 42938 OF 2018 DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS