JAI SHREE PRASAD YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 ORS.
WRIA/39957/2016 · 2025-02-07
Ajay Bhanot
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45366 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45366 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:18536 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39957 of 2016 Petitioner :- Jai Shree Prasad Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Yadav,C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Matter is listed under the heading of cases likely to have become infructuous (efflux of time). Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears to press the writ petition. Names of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondent are shown in the cause list. It is evident that the petitioner does not have any interest in prosecuting the writ petition, as the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Vandit Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad