Patibandla Ajay Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/9571/2022 · 2025-04-28
T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45364 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45364 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
X < IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 9571 OF 2022 Between:
1. Patibandia Ajay Kumar, S/o Venkatewarlu, aged 49 years, Occ- cultivation, Rio D.No. 1-98, Main Road, Doddavarappadu village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole Revenue Division, Ongole, Prakasam District.
4. The Tahsildar, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District.
5. Patibandia Satyavathi, W/o. Late Venkataseshaiah, aged 64 years, R/o N.P.J Waters, Tipperla bazaar, Mangalagiri Town, Guntur District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the one part of the respondents 2 to 4 on petitioner's objections dated 26.03.2022, 10.03.2022 and 21.02.2022 issued by way legal notice, submitted for
consideration of his objections, in the event of entertaining any application for mutation and granting E- Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed in favour of
r / ^ the 5“^ respondent connected to petitioner's agricultural landed properties of Ac. 0.33 Cents in Sy.No.50/1, Ac.2.00 Cents in Sy.No.56, Ac.0.97 cents in Sy.No.165/1 and Ac.0.75 cents in Sy.No. 105/IB of Doddavarappadu Revenue Village in Maddipadu Mandal of Prakasam District as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on respondents under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and rules framed there Article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the to 4 to record red mark with digitally unsigned in web land Record of Rights such as Pattadar Adangal and 1- B connected to the aforesaid final adjudication of suit in O.S.No.254/2022 on the file of Learned Court of Principle Junior Civil Judge, Ongole.
lA NO: 1 OF 2099 under and offends respondents 2 lands till Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i Court may be pleased to direct the in support of the petition, the High respondents 2 to 4 to record red mark with digitally unsigned in web land Record of Rights such Adangal and 1- B connected to petitioner's landed properties of Ac. 0.33 Cents in Sy.No.50/1, as Pattadar Ac.2.00 Cents in Sy.No.56, Ac.0.97 cents i cents in Sy.No. 105/IB of Doddavarappadu Revenue Village in Maddipadu Mandal of Prakasam District adjudication of civil suit in O.S.No.254/2022 on the file of Learned Court of Principle Junior Civil Judge, Ongole. in Sy.No.165/1 and Ac.0.75 till final Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following;
\ APHC010151842022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE HffiH [3505] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 9571/2022 Between: Patibandia Ajay Kumar ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.SS RAMA KRISHNA PRASAD ...RESPONDENT(S)
f 2 % The Court made the following order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition and addressed a letter, dated 28.04.2025 to the Registry. It is placed on record. Acceding the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A. VENU GOPAL RAO assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// \ Vv" SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SMT. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. Three CD Copies KSR
/ HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025
ORDER oF and«;^ WP.No.9571 of 2022 I 11 SEP 2025 ^ . Current Section ^ m?
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS