Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45363 (RAJ)

RAHUL KUMAR S/O SHRI RAMAVATAR SONI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13415/2025 · 2025-12-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49074] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13415/2025 Rahul Kumar S/o Shri Ramavatar Soni, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward Number 09, Darjiyon Ka Mohalla Badhavas, Thana Renwal, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail Sambhar Lake) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G. L. Soni with Mr. Gorang Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 312/2025 registered at Police Station Renwal District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that the applicant is a student who is pursuing the studies under a law course in second year. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and matter is triable by Magistrate. It is further submitted that applicant is in custody ever since 16.09.2025 and there is no criminal antecedent registered against him. Learned counsel has placed reliance upon the order dated 25.11.2025 of the Coordinate Bench of this Court passed in Vasim Akram Vs. [2025:RJ-JP:49074] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13415/2025] State of Raj.: SBCRLMB No. 13042/2025. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that it is a myth to state that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant. It is submitted that there are 17 complaints registered on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal from different parts of the country. It is also submitted that an amount of Rs. 2 crors has been routed through their bank accounts. Further, it is submitted that matter is of Cyber crime and it is white collar crime carried out in an organized manner. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that if applicant will be released at this stage when investigation is ongoing on all India basis, will effect the entire investigation. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there are 17 complaints registered on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal; that an amount of Rs. 2 Crores is involved in the present case; that the order relied upon by the counsel for the applicant is distinguishable from the facts of the present case and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed. [2025:RJ-JP:49074] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13415/2025] (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/61