Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 45360 (BOM)
SMT. SABRA BEGUM WD/O RASHEED KHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AND UPPER LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NAGPUR AND ANOTHER
CAO/1558/2019 · 2025-09-22
Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45360 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45360 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 21.cao.1558.2019 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1558 OF 2019 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 1799/2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST NO. 909 OF 2015 Smt. Sabra Begum wd/o Rasheed Khan and anr. ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.C. Joshi, AGP for the State.
CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 22/09/2025. Today the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 17.09.2025 there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant/applicant and therefore, to grant one more opportunity, this matter was adjourned for today.
2. However, none appeared on behalf of the appellant in the morning sessions nor in the afternoon session.
3. Hence, it is clear that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the present appeal.
4. As such, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL
, J. )
Trupti