Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45360 (AP)

BHUPATHI VINUTANA SAI @ SAIM @ SUNNY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/7317/2025 · 2025-07-21

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO lA No. 1 OF 2025 IN CRLP NO: 7317 OF 2025 Between: Bhupathi Vinutana Sai @ Saim @ Sunny, S/o. Durga Prasad, aged 21 years, r/o. Ogispet, Machilipatnam, Krishna District ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 (Petitioner in CRLP 7317 OF 2025 on the file of High Court) AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravati. 2. The Station House Officer, Robertsonpet Police Station, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ... Respondents/Complainant (Respondents in-do-) Counsel for the Petitioner :Sri.MALLAVOLU NIKITHA Counsel for the Respondents:PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 482(2) r/w.528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to relax Condition Nos. (ii) and (iii) imposed in order dated 22-07-2025 in CrlP.No.7317 of 2025, insofar as it directs the petitioner on every Saturday between p.m., till filing of the charge sheet in connection with to appear before the SHO once in a week, i.e. 10.00 a.m. and 05.00 Crime No.55 of 2025 of Robertsonpet Police Station, Machilipatnam, Pending disposal of CRLP No. 7317 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused No.1 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the conditions imposed by this Court have been complied with by the petitioner/accused No.1. For the reasons mentioned in the petition and the submission of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, the conditions imposed by this Court while granting bail to the petitioner in CrI.P. No.7317 of 2025, dated 22.07.2025, at paragraph No.8 (ii) directing the petitioner/accused No.1 shall appear before the Station House Officer, Robertsonpet Police Station, Krishna District, on every Saturday in between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., till the conclusion of the trial; and (iii) the petitioner/accused No.1 shall not leave the limits of the District without prior permission from the learned Trial Judge, are hereby relaxed. Accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed. SD/- T. SRINIVASA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR - SECTION O^IC^ER //TRUE COPY// For I To, 1. The Station House Officer, Robertsonpet Police Station, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.( By RPAD) 2. One CC to Sri. Mallavolu Nikitha Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P [OUT] 4. One spare copy high court DR.YLR.J DATED: 10/12/2025 ORDER I.A.No.lof 2025 IN CRLP.No.7317 of 2025 I.A.No.i of 2025 is allowed !