APHC010205832019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8911/2019 Between: 1. SUNKARI DILEEP KUMAR, S/O SREEDHAR MURTHY AGED 43 YEARS R/O 7955 HAMPTON LAKE DR TAMPA. FL USA 33647 PETITIONER IS REP BY HIS GPA HOLDER SUNKARI SREEDHAR MURTHY S/O LATE YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.11-952, ARAVINDA NAGAR ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT AT AMARAVATHI 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJUWAKA POLICE STATION VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. SUBBINENI ANNAPURNA, W/O SIVA PRASADA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/O BUTHUMALLI VILLAGE AND POST VEMURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. SUBBINENI SIVA PRASADA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O BUTHUMALLI VILLAGE AND POST VEMURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment over the land to an extent of 1200 Sq Yards of open land situated in Sy.Nos.303/9 and 10 of Kanithi Village, G.V.M.0 Limits, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District at the instance of the Respondents 4 and 5 while pendency of civil litigation in O.S.No.188 of 2019 pending on the file of Junior Civil Judge Court, Gajuwaka as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Articles 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions to the 3rd Respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute of the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 and 5 in respect land to an extent of 1200 Sq Yards situated in Sy.Nos.303/9 and 10 of Kanithi Village, G.V.M.C Limits, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District in any manner IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute of the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 and 5 in respect of land to an extent of 1200 Sq Yards situated in Sy.Nos.303/9 & 10 of Kanithi Village, G.V.M.0 Limits, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District in any manner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.8911 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment over the land to an extent of 1200 Sq Yards of open land situated in Sy.Nos.303/9 and 10 of Kanithi Village, G.V.M.0 Limits, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District at the instance of the Respondents 4 and 5 while pendency of civil litigation in O.S.No.188 of 2019 pending on the file of Junior Civil Judge Court, Gajuwaka as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Articles 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions to the 3rd Respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute of the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 and 5 in respect land to an extent of 1200 Sq Yards situated in Sy.Nos.303/9 and 10 of Kanithi Village, G.V.M.C Limits, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District in any manner and to pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel representing Sri P.Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home already submitted that the preliminary enquiry conducted by the police revealed that the impugned dispute is purely civil in nature, and therefore, police will not interfere in this matter. 4. The submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home are placed on record. 5. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that no further orders are required in the writ petition. 4 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12.11.2025 Pmk 5 31 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:8911 OF 2019 Date: 12.11.2025 Pmk