Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45351 (PNJ)

ALM INFOTECH CITY PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/10335/2025 · 2025-05-08

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-10335-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10335-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.05.2025 ALM Infotech City Pvt. Ltd. ......Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate, and Mr. Vishal Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl.A.G., Haryana, and Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing of notification No.50/15/2024-5S (1) dated 11.05.2024 (Annexure P-1) issued by the Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties are ad idem that the issue involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 24.04.2025 passed by a Co- AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.17 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10335-2025 (O&M) -2- ordinate Bench of this Court in M/s Vatika Limited vs. Union of India and others, CWP-14937-2024. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms as in CWP-14937-2024. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 08.05.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.17 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document