[2025:RJ-JP:47614-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18292/2025 Ramjilal Meena Son Of Shri Sriram Meena, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of House No. 1379/26, Gali No. 1, Gadwloon Ki Gali Vigyan Nagar, Adarsh Nagar, Ajmer-305001. Presently Working As Food Safety Officer, Ajmer Division (Group ‘C’ Post) ----Petitioner(Respondent No.4 before Ld.CAT) Versus 1. Union Of India, Through General Manager, North Western Railway, Headquarter Office, Jagatpura Road, Near Jawahar Circle, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur-302017, Rajasthan. 2. Principal Chief Medical Director, North Western Railway, Headquarter Office, Jagatpura Road, Near Jawahar Circle, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur-302017, Rajasthan 3. The Divisional Railway Manager, North Western Railway, Ajmer, Division, Ajmer-305001, Rajasthan 4. Sh.Manoj Sinha Son Of Shri Ambika Prasad Sinha, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of A-116, Chandarvardai Nagar, Ajmer-305001, Rajasthan. Presently Working As Food Safety Officer, Ajmer Division (Group C Post) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Preeti Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Mathur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 25/11/2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 17.10.2025, whereby an interim order has been granted by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter [2025:RJ-JP:47614-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-18292/2025] referred to as ‘learned Tribunal’) staying the effect & operation of the order dated 08.10.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is respondent No.4 in the Original Application No.563/2025 filed by Manoj Sinha and before passing the impugned stay order no opportunity of hearing was afforded to the present petitioner. She, therefore, submits that an application for vacation of stay has been filed before the learned Tribunal and the same is pending for consideration before this Court. She submits that the next date in OA before the Tribunal is 27.11.2025 and, therefore, learned counsel submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if the learned Tribunal is directed to decide the application seeking vacation of stay order filed by the petitioner on the next date fixed or at the earliest date fixed by the learned Tribunal. 4. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not being objected by learned counsel for the respondents. 5. Hence, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Tribunal to decide the Original Application itself expeditiously and if that is not possible then atleast pending application seeking vacation of stay and/or stay petition itself may be decided at the earliest preferably on the next date fixed by the learned Tribunal. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J Monika/108