Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45345 (BOM)

TANABAI VITTHALRAO INGOLE AND OTHERS v. KHUSHAL S/O MAHADEORAO KOHADE (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. PUSHPA KHUSHALRAO KOHAD AND OTHERS

CAS/667/2022 · 2025-02-10

Shri M W Chandwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.sa.53.22 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAS] No.667 of 2022 in Second Appeal No. 53 of 2022 Tanabai Vithalrao Ingole and others vs. Khushal s/o Mahadeorao Kohade (Dead) through L.Rs and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. N.S. Bhattad, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. P.R. Jain h/f Mr. M.R. Joharapurkar, Advocate for Res. Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Shyam Bissa, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.3 & 4. CORAM : M.W. CHANDWANI, J. DATE : 10 th FEBRUARY, 2025. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. 02. Having gone through the reasons mentioned in the application, it appears that most part of the delay is covered by the lockdown. 03. Considering the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay caused in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. The appeal be registered. 04. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. 05. Stand over after two weeks. JUDGE *sandesh 2025:BHC-NAG:1286