Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45344 (CHH)

LALU RAM KORCHE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5291/2025 · 2025-10-08

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:50327 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5291 of 2025 Lalu Ram Korche S/o Ramprasad Korche Aged About 35 Years Occupation - Computer Operator/ Date Entry Operator Paddy Procurement Center Kachhe Lams Bhanupratappur R/o Village Hafri, Post Bheja P.S. Korar, Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District (North Bastar) Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur, Police Station - Rakhi, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector (Co-Operative Branch) Uttar-Bastar-Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh 3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, 6th Floor, Tower-C, Commercial Complex C B D, Sector 21, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Societies Uttar-Bastar-Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh 5 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipadan Sangh Maryadit Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer District Co-Operative Central Bank Maryadit Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh 7 - Manager Lams Bhanupratapur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA For Respondents No.3 to 5 : Mr. RK Jha, Advocate ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.10.10 11:47:20 +0530 2 / 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 09/10/2025 1. The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even in the second call none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In such circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the instant writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu