Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
f APHC010173432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 5 B FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 9fi6 OF 2025 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to committing contempt of orders of this Hon’ble Court passed of 2021, Dt.28.04.2023 passed by Hon’ble High under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. Between: RAO summon the respondents and punish them for in W.P.No.17430 Court of Andhra Pradesh BH. Kran Maheswan, W/o BH. Bhaskara Rao, Aged 52 years Prohibition and Excise Inspector, R/o D.No.3-112/8,^ G V Colony’ Purushottapuram, Ward No 75, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND Kumar Meena IAS, Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Distrtct^^*^^’ Building, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur Kumar IAS, Commissioner of Prohibition Excise/Director and Excise Prohibition, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Prasadampadu, Vijayawada, Krishna District
2. Sri and ...Respondents
« r' A Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MANOJ KUMAR BETHAPUDI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI NAGARAJU PULLAGURA The Court made the following Order:
APHC010173432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 956/2025 f Tnr.*,— ■ [3330] Between: Bh. Kiran Maheswari ...PETITIONER AND Mukesh Kumar Meena IAS and others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.MANOJ KUMAR BETHAPUDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA The Court made the following:
2 •^4- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO. 956 of 2025
ORDER: This Court vide
order, dated 28.04.2023
disposed W.P.No. 17385 of 2021 directing the respondent authorities to complete the disciplinary proceedings as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order, or else, it is needless to say that the charges framed against the petitioner stands quashed automatically without reference to any further order of this Court. For non-compliance of the said order, the present contempt case is filed.
2. Learned Government Pleader, Sri Pullagura Nagaraju, appearing for the respondents has furnished the proceedings in Memo No.C.No.51872A/ig.V(2)/2012, dated 23.05.2025. As seen from the said proceedings, it transpires that the disciplinary proceedings initiated vide TEC.No.363/2013, dated 30.08.2018 against the petitioner are treated as closed.
3.
4. In view of the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K TATA RAO deputy REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 7 SECTION OFFICER To, Meena IAS, Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur
1. Sri Mukesh Kumar Department, A.P. Secretariat Building, District.
iX^
2. Sri Nishant Kumar IAS, Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise/Director and Excise Prohibition, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Prasadampadu, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
3. One CC to Sri ManoJ Kumar Bethapudi Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri Nagaraju Pullagura Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies SAM VNA
f?:' HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025
ORDER C.C. No. 956 of 2025 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS