Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 45343 (BOM)
SUSHILA ASHOK DAHIKAR v. ASHOK PANDHARI DAHIKAR
CAO/210/2023 · 2025-02-04
Shri Nitin B Suryawanshi, Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45343 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45343 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 42.cao.210.2023 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NA
GPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 210 OF 2023 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 1768 OF 2023 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2017 Sushila w/o Ashok Dahikar ..vs.. Ashok s/o Pandhari Dahikar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.J. Dhoble, Advocate for applicant/appellant. Shri S. Bhalerao, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 04/02/2025. Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. Application is allowed.
3. Civil Application is disposed of.
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.1768 OF 2023
4. Heard.
5. For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer Clause (i).
6. Misc. Civil Application is disposed of.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL
, J.
) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI
, J. )
Trupti