Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45331 (RAJ)

RAMRAJ CHOUDHARY S/O LATE RODULAL JAT v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

CW/13786/2025 · 2025-10-15

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42294] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13786/2025 Ramraj Choudhary S/o Late Rodulal Jat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Rajpurabas, Post Pachewar, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director. 2. Executive Manager (Transport /establishment), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Depot Office, Tonk, District Tonk. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13864/2025 Rameshwar Choudhary S/o Late Shri Laduram Jat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Jhirana, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director. 2. Executive Manager (Transport/establishment), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Depot Office, Tonk District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar [2025:RJ-JP:42294] (2 of 3) [CW-13786/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/10/2025 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13864/2025 1. Learned counsel offers to withdraw S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13864/2025 2. Hence, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13864/2025 is dismissed as withdrawn. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13786/2025 1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13786/2025 has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships' may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition; call for and examine entire record of the case and a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the impugned transfer order dated 15.1.2025 and relieving order dated 8.7.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the petitioner may kindly be permitted to render his duties at his present place of posting. b) Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioner..” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner agreed that the petitioner may be granted permission to file [2025:RJ-JP:42294] (3 of 3) [CW-13786/2025] an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /28-29