IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3614 OF 2024 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to punish the Contemnor herein for gross and willful violation of the interim order dated 16.07.2024 in W.A No.608 of 2024. Between: Nallamothu Chalapathi Rao, S/o. Late N.Venkaiah Aged about 74 years, R/o 284/1 Street, Adusumalli Parchur Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh-523169. ...PETITIONER AND Goutham Suguna, W/o.Srinivasa Reddy, Aged Unknown, R/o.Gandavaram Village, Kodavaluru Manal, S.P.S.R. Nellore District, A.P-524317. Smt. K.Kalavathi, W/o.Subramanyam (Late) Aged Unknown, R/o.D.No. 1-1507, Padugupadu Village, Kovur Mandal, S.P.S.R. Nellore District; A. P-524137. 1. 2. ...RESPONDENT No. 5 & 6 in W.A. No. 608 of 2024 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. N. SAI PHANINDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: — The Court made the following ORDER: C' APHC010392142024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3525] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3614/2024 I I Between: Nallamothu Chalapathi Rao ...PETITIONER A Goutham Suguna and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.N SAI PHANINDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the interim order dated 16.07.2024 passed by this Court i W.A.No.608 of 2024. ...CONTEMNOR(S) 1. in 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order against which compliance is sought, has worked itself out as the main writ appeal itself has been dismissed. In these circumstances, no cause survives in the contempt case. 3. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is ciosed. No order as to costs. Consequently. Misceilaneous Petitions, if any. pending i Case shall stand closed. the Contempt in / * ® CHITTI JOSEPH assistant registrar Section officer Unknown, District, 3. One CC to SRI. N. SAI PHANINDRA KUMAR Advocate 5.' rl' CD coSl //TRUE COPY// To, Suguna. W/o.Srinivasa A.p:?243iT''®"' '^'""3®' Kodlvaium Reddy. Aged U Manal. S.P.S.R. Nellore ro L/ioinui [OPUCJ Chp i- HIGH COURT DATED:22/04/2025 ORDER CC.No.3614 of 2024 ^2 5 JUL 2025 )| CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE